EU and national environmental, animal welfare, water and biodiversity requirements are not always coherent. Near protected areas or under nitrogen frameworks, projects can be delayed, reduced or blocked entirely.
Across Europe, farmers and agricultural cooperatives are constantly looking to improve, modernise, invest and build more resilient businesses. Yet complex, costly and unpredictable permitting procedures leave far too many projects stuck on paper. Yet you may not realise just how widespread this problem is.
Explore the evidence
In 2025, Copa and Cogeca conducted two successive surveys among farmers and agricultural cooperatives to identify the main structural barriers holding back their development. More than 1,000 responses from farms and cooperatives of all sizes and across all agricultural sectors in 20 EU Member States pointed to the same conclusion.
Select a bar to inspect the response.
| Burdensome regulations | 62% |
|---|---|
| Environmental rules hard to meet | 37% |
| Labour shortage | 32% |
| Low prices for animal products | 32% |
| Uncertainty related to input costs | 30% |
| Public opinion and animal welfare pressure | 28% |
| Competition from imports | 23% |
| Limited investment capacity | 15% |
| Dealing with animal diseases | 15% |
| Difficulties accessing markets | 4% |
| Difficulties accessing loans | 3% |
Among the regulations farmers find difficult to implement, the main ones are linked to EU directives, regulations and delegated acts: the CAP, nitrates, animal welfare, veterinary medicines and industrial emissions.
These rules become particularly problematic at the exact moment a farmer tries to launch a new project and needs a permit to move forward.
Response count
| CAP environmental rules | 148 |
|---|---|
| Nitrates Directive | 114 |
| Animal Welfare | 113 |
| Veterinary Medicines legislation | 79 |
| Industrial Emission Directive | 56 |
| Animal Health Law | 52 |
| SPS standards | 48 |
| Water Framework Directive | 39 |
| Bird and Habitat Directive | 33 |
| NEC directive | 29 |
| EIA | 28 |
| Legislations on Feed | 12 |
| Marketing Standards | 12 |
| Other | 31 |
Percentage of respondents
| Too much uncertainty about the future | 65% |
|---|---|
| Difficulty getting permits or approvals | 53% |
| Lack of money or incentives | 39% |
| Lack of clear rules | 36% |
| Succession | 1% |
| Shortage of skilled workers | 1% |
| Bureaucracy | 1% |
The survey results show permitting as a major structural barrier to the development, modernisation and competitiveness of EU agriculture.
For many farmers, obtaining administrative approval for a new project is one of the biggest obstacles to improving their production systems.
Permitting procedures are excessively long, complex and unpredictable. Farmers can wait months or years while facing overlapping requirements, unclear timelines, inconsistent interpretations and duplicated administrative steps.
Select a reason.
| Because the procedure is long and/or burdensome | 37% |
|---|---|
| Because the procedure is too expensive | 12% |
| Too high a risk of water or air pollution, such as nitrates, manure storage or greenhouse gas emissions | 9% |
| Too close to protected areas, including Natura 2000, rivers or drinking water zones | 7% |
| Because it does not comply with another environmental legislation | 7% |
| Because my municipality or the local authorities are opposed | 7% |
| Because my neighbours are opposed | 6% |
| For animal health or welfare reasons | 4% |
| Because NGOs oppose it | 4% |
| Because of zoning requirements | 4% |
| No difficulty reported | 3% |
A delayed permit does not stop at one application. It changes what farms can afford, build and pass on.
EU and national environmental, animal welfare, water and biodiversity requirements are not always coherent. Near protected areas or under nitrogen frameworks, projects can be delayed, reduced or blocked entirely.
Applications, environmental assessments and technical studies can be prohibitively expensive. Similar thresholds for family farms and industrial operations deepen inequality and accelerate consolidation.
Permits are needed to upgrade buildings, improve animal welfare, adopt green technologies and reduce emissions. The system can block the very investments environmental policy is trying to encourage.
Municipalities, NGOs, neighbours or citizens can delay or stop projects. Important consultation processes are increasingly experienced as another unpredictable barrier.
Farmers hesitate to make long-term, capital-intensive investments when approval, conditions and timing cannot be predicted. That same uncertainty makes younger farmers less willing to take over a business.
Permitting is more than an administrative hurdle. It limits investment, delays innovation and weakens the resilience and competitiveness of European agriculture.
At a moment when the EU is advancing its Competitiveness Compass and strengthening its sovereignty, removing unnecessary uncertainty is essential to unlock the sector's full potential.
No comprehensive EU-level study yet quantifies the lost potential, but our map already illustrates the scale of the opportunity cost on the ground.